From the article: OLED and MicroLED are the future

  • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fair enough. LCD is very old technology at this point, dating back to the 1960s.

    Of course, LEDs aren’t exactly new either, but microscopic LEDs bright enough to be used as pixels certainly are.

  • Eribetra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really hope microLED takes off in the near future. It’s basically OLED on steroids, all of its advantages without the risk of screen burn-in. It’s just too expensive right now…

    • glitchinthematrix@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What about Hisense with the U8H Class are they using microled(they call it miniled)? this Tv is not that expensive compared with other brands and tbh the image quality in the high-end models are awesome.

  • AaronMaria@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have been reading about MicroLEDs for years now, never bought any OLED because of the burn-in. I’m curious when MicroLEDs will actually hit the mass-market and at what price-point and also how they will scale for smaller screens.

    • fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve had my QD-OLED for a little while now and it has had quite a bit of static images on it without any trouble. From what I read before I bought it, OLEDs in general really don’t have a burn-in issue like the early models did.

      From what I can tell they’re better than even plasma was at the end. And you’d have trouble actively trying to get permanent burn in on some later model plasmas. I used to service TVs and appliances. In most cases outside of using a plasma display for digital signage, I’d be able to run a swiping pattern for a little bit to get rid of the image retention. The only exception I really had for a plasma that was used in a residence was an older couple who didn’t have a widescreen source and only watched shows in 4:3 aspect ratio. They finally got the HD channels from their TV provider and realized they had the bars on the sides burned in (really the screen aged unevenly).

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now if I could just a “dumb” TV that doesn’t have a bunch of built in apps, which apparently is now a huge ask. I just want my TV to display whatever HDMI port is currently selected. Not nag me about connecting it to WiFi every time I turn it on.

        • ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I personally use a 28 inch monitor, although I’m hoping to upgrade to a 32-35 inch ultrawide soon.

          I don’t really watch TV in a living room. Instead I have my monitor sitting on my desk, so I don’t share the screen with anyone else. Thus, my situation might be different than yours. Hope that helps

          Edit: bad grammar