Basically any stance on this conflict besides “civilian casualties bad” is a shit take, I’m not going to be surprised if a reporter gets fired for conflating Israel v Hamas with Muslim v Jew
From your perspective, how does the current situation in Israel and the territories that Israel controls differ from Apartheid South Africa? I’m trying to understand your world view.
I’m trying to understand how it is different in your eyes. How is the Israeli government’s segregation different from the Apartheid South African government’s segregation? Obviously you see a distinction but it’s not obvious to myself and I want to understand your perspective.
Easy! It’s because now a religious group that has historically been the target of unjust discrimination and genocide, are now the ones doing the genociding! The difference is you have to be more delicate in your criticisms
She didn’t speak up for Palestine, she spoke for the destruction of Israel and an Arab state where Jews are second class
Got any quotes/source?
Basically any stance on this conflict besides “civilian casualties bad” is a shit take, I’m not going to be surprised if a reporter gets fired for conflating Israel v Hamas with Muslim v Jew
It’s literally in the article.
From her perspective, she stated the gov of Israel is incompatible with a free Palestine. The whole article is quoting her, I don’t see it.
So she was penalized for a political opinion as if it were hate speech against a religious group. The two are not the same.
Where does is says this as I am it seeing it?
From your perspective, how does the current situation in Israel and the territories that Israel controls differ from Apartheid South Africa? I’m trying to understand your world view.
Not all situations are the same. It’s a different region and situation, even if you really want it to be the same
I’m trying to understand how it is different in your eyes. How is the Israeli government’s segregation different from the Apartheid South African government’s segregation? Obviously you see a distinction but it’s not obvious to myself and I want to understand your perspective.
Easy! It’s because now a religious group that has historically been the target of unjust discrimination and genocide, are now the ones doing the genociding! The difference is you have to be more delicate in your criticisms
Source?
The article itself…
Then you are reading into it as it did not say that anywhere. Feel free to point out the exact line so we can all confirm.
That is not talking about destruction? I don’t get your point?
Don’t you know? Nobody reads articles, we just make judgements based on the title!