• sunzu@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Until then plastic that can’t recycled needs to be burned.

    Whose fucking shiti idea was it to put it landfill?

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Burning plastic sends the waste into the air where it joins the water cycle. The matter isn’t destroyed, it’s just atomized and spread out. Properly sealed landfills ostensibly contain the damage, although we should recognize that landfill regulations are lax at best.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        We already burn oil. I positing burning would fix micro plastic issue.

        This is also not my domain so I am talking out of my ass mostly to get a convo going so maybe somebody competent can provide proper context.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Space elevator. Trash go up, gentle push towards your favorite star (except the sun), bye forever.

          By the way, I know this isn’t practical so a detailed response outlining the challenges is unnecessary.

          • sunzu@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah but deff should stop burning shot but that ain’t happening today.

            Microplastics issue is today.

            My understanding that modern incinerators largely solved the pollution problem and recover energy.

            Sounds like it would be better to burn waste plastic over gas or oil.