• EABOD25@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago
    1. is ironic because that’s exactly how mega corps vote
    2. Peasants (as you said) wouldn’t be able to get their break without
    3. that’s a needed. 100% agree
    4. what about people who are already consuming the bare minimum? What are they supposed to do?
    5. 100% agree
    6. 100% agree
    7. wrong. That’s a privilege. Privileges can be taken away. Freedom is the ability to retard and expect repercussions or advance humanity in a civilized manner. What you are referring to is anarchy, and anarchy doesn’t have to be bad. It puts the power in the individual with no government influence. However anarchy relies strictly on human nature and dependency
    8. 100%
    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Peasants (as you said) wouldn’t be able to get their break without

      How are they getting a break now?

      As for 7, we are talking direct action? i am not following this response.

      what about people who are already consuming the bare minimum? What are they supposed to do?

      there is always room to improve consumption patterns… low hanging fruit is high processed foods. this can be driven two zero without any serious consequences. that’s more of my point here.

      You can’t stop eating tho, no doubt, but you can chose what you eat.

      • EABOD25@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, but we’re talking about the possibility of a utopian society. It’s completely theoretical at this point. You are talking about the logical here and now. What do you want for people in the future?