flying_monkies

Let me know when it becomes a penny stock…

Using zone minder with reolink cameras. I’ve been happy with it so far.

If you set up hardware encryption, be sure to change the master password and set the security level to maximum.

Be aware, this password is different than the Physical Secure ID (PSID) printed on the front of the disk. PSIDs are used when the release to reset command doesn’t work, typically due to key issues, and the drive gets “locked”.

You use the PSID to run a revert to factory defaults command, unlocking the drive. Since this triggers the drive to release its’ key, the drive is considered “cryptographically erased” when you do this.

If you revert the drive, data on it is unrecoverable.

If you’re going to revert a drive, I suggest using a QR Code reader to get the PSID off the drive. Some venders are sadists with the font they choose making it so much fun to figure out if it’s a 1, l i I I O or 0…

It sounds like the article is an update to the age old performance issue discussions between hardware and software RAID solutions.

If you use a software solution for anything where there’s a dedicated hardware solution, the software solution is always slower due to CPU overhead.

Article recommendation boils down to: If you’re going to use encryption, and you want your full disk speed, use a hardware encryption solution. In their test their hardware supported OPAL.

No, they don’t.

SSDs, unless you buy a specifically encryption supported drive, are not encrypted. If it doesn’t indicate SED, SED non-FIPS or a FIPS certification level, the drive doesn’t have an encryption circuit.

Most of SSD already has good encryption methods

Unless you purchase a SED-non FIPS or FIPS SSD, no, they don’t

and an easy way to safely wipe data without re-writing each byte.

ATA Secure Erase is a god send for SSD.

You really are as clueless as the day is long. Explains the Tankie mentality.

And as every other time they fuck around with China, the find out will be: everything is fine

None at all. On the plus side, the last time someone went that pants-on-head stupid and put mines where they shouldn’t, it was a very short war.

So, the take away is Russia is so shitty they’ll fight to get out of it?

Or raise them a bit higher

Ah, another hexbear genius that thinks Putin and his cabinet would survive if they dropped a nuke.

Hmm. They could use agent orange. Maybe bomb Ukraine to the same extent the US bombed North Korea.

Never work, they’d have to have aircraft that could cross the border

And there’s always tactical nukes. They could just start nuking Ukrainian cities one by one, dropping leaflets to warn them of what’s coming beforehand. It might even be more humanitarian if you consider the loss of life that’ll otherwise happen due to the human meat grinder.

Was going to ask if you’re serious, then I saw you’re from hexbear, so you are dumb enough to believe that Pootin might get to use 1 nuke, max.

Great, now do it with all of the confederacy crap

Well, seeing at the beneficiaries are Ukraine, yes it would be worth it. I know you’re either paid to believe or have been huffing the glue that is the reasoning posted on lemmygrad, hopefully you’ll recover your morals or your senses one day.

edit: For reference to the glue sniffing

Your one correct statement in this thread: Negotiating a peace with Russians is more dangerous than anything that happens in the war zone

It is. If you check NightOwl’s post history, you’ll see everything they post that’s war related is FUD/anti-Ukraine

A tRuE fUnCtIoNaRy - the best a tankie can come up with when a tankie gets called out for their bullshit

While the British don’t know as much about war crimes as the Russians, this time they’re technically correct. Technically correct is the best correct.