• Fake4000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. They are two different projects.

    Lineage is about providing a Google free version of android AOSP and supporting as many phones as possible.

    Graphene is about making a privacy centric version of android that can run Google apps sandboxed. Graphene only supports pixel phones.

    • afunkysongaday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lineage is not about providing a google free version of Android. It does not contain google apps, for licensing reasons, probably also to let the user choose. But it does not go further, all the other stuff like captive portal check, agps, dns etc still uses google servers. It’s not “degoogled” in any way. Love lineage btw but we need to be aware of what it is and isn’t.

      • atocci@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wonder where this misconception is coming from, it’s the second time in the last few days I’ve seen it. I can’t remember custom roms ever coming with the Google apps preinstalled, you’d always need to flash them separately before the first boot (thanks XDA). That’s why we have MindTheGApps.

        • vividspecter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I can’t remember custom roms ever coming with the Google apps preinstalled, you’d always need to flash them separately before the first boot

          Many of them do these days. Which is a bit annoying when you want a no-gapps variant and can’t find it.

          • atocci@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s interesting! They aren’t supposed to do that though, right? It goes against Google’s policy.

        • 520@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          It used to be that Cyanogenmod (the precursor project to LineageOS) shipped with Google apps pre installed until they got a cease and desist from Google.

        • baatliwala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Degoogle is the wrong word for lineage because it hasn’t been “engoogled” in the first place, it doesn’t ship with Google services at all. If you simply install the base ROM you don’t have Google.

          The question is if you want to replace Google with mock Google services so certain apps relying on GMS still work, or if you want to replace it completely with FOSS alternatives.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          LineageOS4MicroG is a reasonable starting point. It includes MicroG out of the box, while disabling further app spoofing in the OS (whereas normally if you install MicroG yourself it’s much more difficult to disable app spoofing after you’ve got it set up).

          But as /u/baatliwala@lemmy.world said, this is more likely adding Google (or a mock version of it) to your phone, and LineageOS still doesn’t have a few things that other custom ROMs might - eg captive portal check, A-GPS and DNS settings that /u/afunkysongaday@lemmy.world mentioned. To get rid of those you’ll have to try a proper custom ROM and just read the feature specs. I use DivestOS, and that seems to cover most things.

          In my experience, not all that many apps require Google anymore. I get a few apps complain that they won’t work without Google services, but find that it’s just the map and payment functions that don’t work (meanwhile dedicated map apps like Waze work just fine). Going without Google services altogether is really just about sacrificing a relatively small bit of convenience.

      • rufus@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think GrapheneOS isn’t made for that purpose. It’s made to be safe and do privacy well. I think signature spoofing, rooting to circumvent things etc are opposing requirements. I don’t think everything works. There are websites and other comments with more info. My Banking TAN App works, though. Google Pay doesn’t.

          • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Not to start an argument but why would one want to be using Google Pay after going through the process of de-googling their phone? Seems counterproductive.

            • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fair point. Is there an alternative to Google pay. I don’t use a card and pretty much refuse to use anywhere that requires care or cash

                • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Every alternative except Apple and Samsung pay, which are device specific and proprietary, seem to just be crypto. No NFC FOSS purchases.

                  • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Sadly, there’s not too much I can do about that. From what I’ve understood, there’s a whole lot of red tape around tap-to-pay transaction technology. Personally, I don’t use any of it. Only cash or card where I have to.

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Google Pay gives you worse consumer rights than using your card with contactless. A contactless card purchase is processed as “cardholder not present”, the same as phone catalogue purchases always used to be done, and the same as online purchases. The seller assumes default responsibility in any dispute. When you make a purchase with your card pin, or when you make a purchase with Google Pay, both are considered secure and authorised by you, so that becomes the default position in a dispute.

            If someone steals your card and uses it to make a bunch of contactless purchases, you’d have a much easier time getting them refunded than if the purchases were made with your phone.

      • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d love to see this come to fruition. I’ve wanted Graphene since I first heard about it but refuse to pay the Google tax for admission and live with all the restrictions a Google device comes with

          • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            By “Google tax” I mean having to buy one of their devices and the “restrictions” I’m referring to are the lack of headphone jack and micro SD card slot. They may mean nothing to you or others but they’re both bare minimum requirements for myself and others. For as long as they aren’t available on Pixel devices, I will never consider a Pixel.

            I also hate the ass-backwards hole punch camera but that seems to be even more of a losing battle than the other common sense features I mentioned.